Africa collections hit €90m

Feb 9, 2026 | Global Moves

A digital cover image with “Global Collections Report” in red text, the numbers "2025" in large pink font, and a distorted, brightly coloured statue head blending purple and pink. The red CISAC logo is at the bottom right on a white background.

What that milestone signals (and what it doesn’t)

The headline number is real — but it’s not a streaming flex

Africa’s authors’ societies collected €90 million in 2024, up +14.2% year-on-year, according to CISAC’s Global Collections Report 2025 (published 5 November 2025).

Africa music collections (CISAC)
That’s a real milestone — because it suggests more music use is being converted into royalties that can be invoiced, collected and distributed. But it’s also easy to misread.

First, the €90m figure covers all repertoires (music, audiovisual, literature and more). CISAC also reports Africa’s music collections at €79 million in 2024 (+10.0%). In other words: the “Africa hit €90m” headline is true, but it’s not a pure “songwriter streaming” stat.

CISAC Global Collections Report 2025 — Africa collections highlight

What the milestone signals (market trend)

Collections rise when two things improve at the same time: licensing coverage and data quality.

More businesses, broadcasters and platforms get properly licensed — and usage gets captured cleanly enough to be matched to the right works and right rightsholders. When that pipeline tightens, money that used to leak (through missing reports, incorrect titles, or unmatched writers) has a better chance of reaching statements.

CISAC’s commentary on Africa’s 2024 uplift also shows why “big numbers” need context. The year’s increase was driven by growth in music collections and a large jump in literary collections linked to new reprography collections in Morocco. That’s a reminder that growth can be structural (new licences, better enforcement, improved reporting) rather than simply “more hits”.

What it doesn’t mean (and why creators get tripped up)

Here’s the line creators need to hold:

  • It’s not master-rights income. CISAC collections are not label/distributor income from the sound recording.
  • It’s not a direct DSP payout headline. Streaming can be part of the ecosystem, but CISAC collections span licensing types (broadcast, public performance, and other licences) and the mix differs by region.
  • It’s not automatic or evenly shared. Regional growth can coexist with missing money at creator level when works aren’t registered, splits are disputed, or usage can’t be matched.

Why this matters for African creators (creator impact)

Africa’s upside isn’t only “going global”. It’s also getting credit right at home and across borders.

As African music travels regionally (radio, TV, clubs, festivals, background music, screen uses), the biggest blocker isn’t talent — it’s admin: titles that don’t match, writers who aren’t registered, splits that aren’t agreed, or screen/live uses that aren’t documented.

If collections are rising, the winners will be the creators whose works are easiest to identify and match.

How to make the growth show up on your statement

You don’t need a miracle. You need clean, consistent metadata habits.

Register the work properly (and keep titles consistent)

Register every composition with your society/publisher/admin partner, and keep the information consistent across releases.

Minimum checklist:

  • consistent song title (plus alternates if needed)
  • writers credited by legal name
  • splits that add up to 100%
  • publisher/admin details (if applicable)

Lock splits early — then don’t freestyle later

Split disputes slow matching and can delay payments.

Do a split sheet at creation (or before release). If something changes later, document it formally and notify the relevant parties.

Make setlists your live-performance receipt

No setlist, no reliable trail.

For every show, keep:

  • date + venue + city/country
  • performer/act
  • exact song titles (as registered)

Treat cue sheets like the invoice for screen uses

For TV/film/online video, cue sheets are often the bridge between “used” and “paid”.

Double-check:

  • exact work title
  • writers + publisher/admin
  • usage type (theme/feature/background)
  • duration/timecodes + episode/air details

Know your identifiers (ISRC ≠ ISWC)

  • ISRC identifies the recording (track/master).
  • ISWC identifies the composition (song/work).

They’re both useful — but they do different jobs.

Where Downtown Music Publishing Africa fits in

We’re the publishing plug: we help creators and rights-holders clean works data, validate splits, and run registrations/claims so usage has the best chance of turning into paid statements.

Sources

M

Close

Our Rhythm

AFRICA We Are Down

We’re down with the culture of music — and the creators behind it. Downtown Music Publishing Africa protects the rights, handles the business, and amplifies the voices shaping Africa’s sound, from local legends to global stages.
Other Links
General Links
&

Home Base

&

Behind the Beat

&

On the Feed

&

Get in Touch

©2026 Downtown Music Publishing Africa.
A subsidiary of Downtown Music Holdings.